Failure diagnosis device of emission control system

ABSTRACT

In a failure diagnosis device of an emission control system that utilizes an electrode-based PM sensor provided downstream of a particulate filter in an exhaust conduit to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter, disclosed embodiments may suppress reduction of accuracy of diagnosis of a failure due to in-cylinder rich control. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system starts application of a predetermined voltage to electrodes of the electrode-based PM sensor after a sensor recovery process that removes PM depositing between the electrodes of the PM sensor, and diagnoses a failure of the particulate filter based on an output of the PM sensor measured after elapse of a predetermined time period since the start of application of the predetermined voltage. The failure diagnosis device performs the sensor recovery process during in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs a measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-058558, filed on Mar. 20, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a technique of diagnosing a failure of an emission control system including a particulate filter that is placed in an exhaust conduit of an internal combustion engine and more specifically relates to a technique of diagnosing a failure of a particulate filter by utilizing an electrode-based particulate matter (hereinafter “PM”) sensor that is placed downstream of the particulate filter in the exhaust conduit.

DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

An existing sensor for detecting the amount of PM (particulate matter) included in exhaust gas is an electrode-based PM sensor that includes electrodes arranged to he opposed to each other across an insulating layer and utilizes an electrical characteristic that the value of electric current flowing between the electrodes is varied according to the amount of PM depositing between the electrodes.

An existing method of diagnosing a failure (abnormality) of a particulate filter by utilizing an electrode-based PM sensor compares an output value of the PM sensor (electric signal relating to value of electric current flowing between electrodes of PM sensor) at the time when a predetermined time period has elapsed since termination of a process of removing PM depositing between the electrodes of the PM sensor (hereinafter referred to as “sensor recovery process”) with a predefined reference value, and diagnoses that the particulate filter has a failure when the output value of the PM sensor is higher than the predefined reference value.

SUMMARY

An emission control system of an internal combustion engine includes a three-way catalyst or an NSR (NO_(X) storage reduction) catalyst, in addition to a particulate filter. This emission control system may perform a process of supplying a non-combusted fuel component (for example, hydrocarbon (HO) to the three-way catalyst or the NSR catalyst to convert NO_(X) stored in or adsorbed to the NSR catalyst or to produce ammonia (NH₃) by the three-way catalyst or the NSR catalyst (rich spike process). A technique of the rich spike process controls the air-fuel ratio of an air-fuel mixture that is subjected to combustion in a cylinder of the internal combustion engine to a rich air-fuel ratio which is lower than a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (hereinafter referred to as “in-cylinder rich control”).

As the result of intensive experiments and examinations, disclosed embodiments may improve performance based on the finding that the output value of the PM sensor (value of electric current flowing between electrodes) may be lower in the case where the rich spike process by the in-cylinder rich control is performed than in the case where the rich spike process is not performed on the assumption that a fixed amount of PM flows into the PM sensor. Accordingly, performing the rich spike process by the in-cylinder rich control in the predetermined time period leads to the possibility that the output value of the PM sensor after elapse of the predetermined time period becomes lower than the predefined reference value even when the particulate filter has a failure. This may lead to inaccurate diagnosis that the particulate filter that actually has a failure is diagnosed to have no failure.

By taking into account the above problems, in a failure diagnosis device of an emission control system that utilizes an electrode-based PM sensor provided downstream of a particulate filter in an exhaust conduit to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter, disclosed embodiments may suppress reduction of accuracy of diagnosis of a failure due to in-cylinder rich control.

A failure diagnosis device of an emission control system, in accordance with the present disclosure, may commence application of a predetermined voltage to electrodes of an electrode-based PM sensor after a sensor recovery process that oxidizes and removes PM depositing between the electrodes of the PM sensor, and diagnoses a failure of the particulate filter based on an output of the PM sensor measured after elapse of a predetermined time period since the start of application of the predetermined voltage. The failure diagnosis device performs the sensor recovery process during in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control. This enables a measurement process to be performed at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control.

More specifically, according to one aspect of the disclosure, there is provided a failure diagnosis device of an emission control system that is applied to the emission control system comprising a particulate filter that is placed in an exhaust conduit of an internal combustion engine and is configured to trap PM in exhaust gas; an exhaust gas purification device that is placed upstream of the particulate filter in the exhaust conduit and is configured to purify the exhaust gas by utilizing a non-combusted fuel component included in the exhaust gas; and a supplier configured to perform in-cylinder rich control of changing an air-fuel ratio of an air-fuel mixture subjected to combustion in the internal combustion engine to a rich air-fuel ratio which is lower than a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, so as to supply the non-combusted fuel component to the exhaust gas purification device. The failure diagnosis device comprises a PM sensor that is provided to detect an amount of PM flowing out of the particulate filter, the PM sensor having a sensor element that includes electrodes opposed to each other across an insulating layer and a heater that is configured to heat the sensor element, the PM sensor being configured to output an electric signal relating to an amount of PM depositing between the electrodes under application of a predetermined voltage to the sensor element; and a controller comprising at least one processor configured to perform a process of diagnosing a failure of the particulate filter, based on an output value of the PM sensor. The controller configured to perform a sensor recovery process that controls the heater to heat the sensor element to a temperature that allows for oxidation of PM and thereby oxidizes and removes the PM depositing between the electrodes, and a measurement process that starts application of the predetermined voltage to the sensor element after termination of the sensor recovery process and measures an output value of the PM sensor when a predetermined time period has elapsed since start of application of the predetermined voltage; and diagnose a failure of the particulate filter by comparing the obtained output value of the PM sensor with a predefined reference value. The controller performs the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process. The “electric signal relating to the value of electric current flowing between the electrodes” herein may be a value of electric current flowing between the electrodes or may he a resistance value between the electrodes.

The occurrence of a failure such as breakage or erosion in part of a particulate filter increases the amount of PM that slips through the particulate filter. This increases the amount of PM adhering or depositing between the electrodes of the PM sensor in the predetermined time period in the case where the particulate filter has a failure, compared with the case where the particulate filter has no failure. As a result, the resistance value between the electrodes at the time when the predetermined time period has elapsed since start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes of the PM sensor (hereinafter referred to as “reading timing”) is lower in the case where the particulate filter has a failure than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure. The value of electric current flowing between the electrodes at the reading timing is accordingly higher in the case where the particulate filter has a failure than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure. This allows for diagnosis of whether the particulate filter has a failure by comparing the output value of the PM sensor at the reading timing with a predefined reference value. For example, with regard to the PM sensor that is configured to output the value of electric current flowing between the electrodes, when the output value of the PM sensor at the reading timing is lower than a predefined reference value (current value), diagnosis indicates that the particulate filter has no failure. When the output value of the PM sensor at the reading timing is equal to or higher than the predefined reference value, on the other hand, diagnosis indicates that the particulate filter has a failure. With regard to the PM sensor that is configured to output the resistance value between the electrodes, when the output value of the PM sensor at the reading timing is higher than a predefined reference value (resistance value), diagnosis indicates that the particulate filter has no failure. When the output value of the Pm sensor at the reading timing is equal to or lower than the predefined reference value, on the other hand, diagnosis indicates that the particulate filter has a failure.

The predetermined time period herein denotes a time duration specified to provide a significant difference between the output values of the PM sensor at the reading timing in the case where the particulate filter has a failure and in the case where the particulate filter has no failure and may be determined in advance by a fitting operation based on an experiment or the like. The predefined reference value is provided such as to determine that at least part of the particulate filter has a failure such as breakage or erosion when the current value output from the PM sensor at the reading timing is equal to or higher than the predefined reference value (or when the resistance value output from the PM sensor at the reading timing is equal to or lower than the predefined reference value). In other words, the predefined reference value corresponds to a value output from the PM sensor at the reading timing when the measurement process is performed for a particulate filter that is on the boundary between normal and abnormal.

Intensive experiments and examinations have resulted in obtaining the finding that the output value of the PM sensor at the reading timing is lower in the case where in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period than in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed. This may be attributed to the following reasons. The stronger linkage of SOF (Soluble Organic Fraction) with soot included in the exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine is expected in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed than in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed. Accordingly, when the in-cylinder rich control is not performed, SOF is expected to hardly adhere and deposit between the electrodes of the PM sensor, while only soot is expected to adhere and deposit between the electrodes of the PM sensor. When the in-cylinder rich control is performed, on the other hand, SOF as well as soot is expected to adhere and deposit between the electrodes of the PM sensor. The electrical conductivity of SOF is lower than the electrical conductivity of soot. It is accordingly expected to increase the resistance value between the electrodes and thereby decrease the value of electric current flowing between the electrodes in the case where a large amount of SOF deposits between the electrode of the PM sensor, compared with the case where a small amount of SOF deposits, in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, there is a possibility that the current value output from the PM sensor at the reading timing becomes lower than the predefined reference value (or the resistance value output from the PM sensor at the reading timing becomes higher than the predefined reference value) even when the particulate filter has a failure. When diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter is performed based on the output value of the PM sensor at the reading timing in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, there is accordingly a possibility that the particulate filter that actually has a failure is incorrectly diagnosed to have no failure.

The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to the above aspect of the disclosure performs the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the, in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process. This configuration enables PM depositing between the electrodes to he oxidized and removed during the in-cylinder rich control or at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. As a result, this enables the measurement process to be started at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. Starting the measurement process at the earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control enables the measurement process to be terminated prior to next in-cylinder rich control. The failure diagnosis device of this aspect accordingly allows the measurement process to be performed, while preventing the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period. When the sensor recovery process is triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control, the controller may perform preheat treatment that controls the heater to heat the sensor element to a specified temperature lower than the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM during the in-cylinder rich control. The “specified temperature” herein denotes a temperature that is higher than a minimum temperature that activates the sensor element. There is a need to heat the sensor element to the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM in the sensor recovery process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. The configuration of performing the preheat treatment has preheated the sensor element and thus enables the temperature of the sensor element to be quickly increased to the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM. The measurement process is started after oxidation and removal of PM depositing between the electrodes. The failure diagnosis device of this aspect allows the measurement process to be performed, while preventing next in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period.

In the failure diagnosis device of the emission control system of the above aspect, further comprising: that the controller configured to: predict whether the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, before the sensor recovery process is actually performed. When it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, the controller may perform the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently perform the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process.

When it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period, the controller may perform the sensor recovery process and subsequently perform the measurement process after termination of the sensor recovery process.

On prediction that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, the failure diagnosis device of this aspect performs the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process. This configuration accordingly enables the measurement process to be terminated prior to next in-cylinder rich control. On prediction that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period, on the other hand, the failure diagnosis device of this aspect immediately performs the sensor recovery process and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the sensor recovery process. This allows for quick detection of a failure of the particulate filter.

In the failure diagnosis device of the emission control system of the above aspect, the exhaust gas purification device may include an NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst (NSR catalyst) that is configured to store NO_(X) in the exhaust gas when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a lean air-fuel ratio higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. The supplier may perform the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst, when a NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst becomes equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limit storage amount. The controller may predict that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than an allowable storage amount which is smaller than the upper limit storage amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period. when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is less than the allowable storage amount. The “allowable storage amount” herein is provided as a NO_(X) storage amount that causes the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst to be performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the measurement process is started in the state that the NO_(X) storage amount is equal to or greater than the allowable storage amount or as a NO_(X) storage amount that causes the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst to be performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the NO_(X) storage amount becomes equal to or greater than the allowable storage amount during the measurement process, and is determined in advance by experiment. This configuration allows for prediction of whether the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, before the in-cylinder rich control is actually performed for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst.

In the case where the exhaust gas purification device includes the NSR catalyst, when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is increased to a certain level, in-cylinder rich control is performed for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst. In the emission control system where the exhaust gas purification device includes the NSR catalyst and the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst becomes equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limit poisoning amount, the controller may predict that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than an allowable poisoning amount which is smaller than the upper limit poisoning amount. The “allowable poisoning amount” herein is provided as a sulfur poisoning amount that causes the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst to be performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the measurement process is started in the state that the sulfur poisoning amount is equal to or greater than the allowable poisoning amount or as a sulfur poisoning amount that causes the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst to be performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the sulfur poisoning amount becomes equal to or greater than the allowable poisoning amount during the measurement process, and is determined in advance by experiment. This configuration allows for prediction of whether the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, before the in-cylinder rich control is actually performed for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst.

In the failure diagnosis device of the emission control system of the above aspect, the exhaust gas purification device may include a selective catalytic reduction catalyst (SCR catalyst) that is configured to adsorb NH₃ included in the exhaust gas and reduce NO_(X) in the exhaust. gas using the adsorbed NH₃ as a reducing agent, and an NH₃ producing catalyst that is placed upstream of the SCR catalyst and is configured to produce NH₃ when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. The supplier may perform the in-cylinder rich control to produce NH₃ by the NH₃ producing catalyst when an NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst becomes equal to or less than a predetermined lower limit adsorption amount. The controller may predict that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is equal to or less than an allowable adsorption amount which is larger than the lower limit adsorption amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is greater than the allowable adsorption amount. The “allowable adsorption amount” herein is provided as an NH₃ adsorption amount that causes the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of producing NH₃ to be performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the measurement process is started in the state that the NH₃ adsorption amount is equal to or less than the allowable adsorption amount or as an NH₃ adsorption amount that causes the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of producing NH₃ to he performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the NH₃ adsorption amount becomes equal to or less than the allowable adsorption amount during the measurement process, and is determined in advance by experiment. This configuration allows for prediction of whether the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, before the in-cylinder rich control is actually performed for the purpose of producing NH₃.

In the failure diagnosis device of the emission control system that utilizes the electrode-based PM sensor provided downstream of the particulate filter in the exhaust conduit to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter, the above aspects of the disclosed embodiments may suppress reduction of the accuracy of diagnosis of a failure due to the in-cylinder rich control.

Further features of the disclosed embodiments will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the schematic configuration of an internal combustion engine and its air intake and exhaust system with which an embodiment, referred to below as Embodiment 1, may be applied;

FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating the configuration of a PM sensor;

FIG. 3 is diagrams showing variations in output value of a PM sensor after termination of a sensor recovery process;

FIG. 4 is diagrams showing variations in output value of the PM sensor after termination of the sensor recovery process in the case where a particulate filter has a failure;

FIG. 5 is a timing chart showing the execution timings of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in an NSR catalyst and the execution timings of the sensor recovery process;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by an ECU to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter according to Embodiment 1;

FIG. 7 is a timing chart showing the execution timings of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst and the execution timings of the sensor recovery process;

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the schematic configuration of an internal combustion engine and its air intake and exhaust system with which an embodiment, referred to below as Modification 2 of Embodiment 1, may be applied;

FIG. 9 is a timing chart showing the execution timings of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to an SCR catalyst;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter according to an embodiment referred to below as Embodiment 2;

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter according to an embodiment referred to below as Modification 1 of Embodiment 2; and

FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter according to an embodiment referred to below as Modification 2 of Embodiment 2.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

The following describes concrete embodiments of the disclosure with reference to the drawings. The dimensions, the materials, the shapes, the positional relationships and the like of the respective components described in the following embodiments are only for the purpose of illustration and not intended at all to limit the scope of the embodiments to such specific descriptions.

Embodiment 1

The following describes Embodiment 1 with reference to FIGS. 1 to 7. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of an internal combustion engine 1 and its air intake and exhaust system with which disclosed embodiments may be applied. The internal combustion engine 1 shown in FIG. 1 is a compression ignition internal combustion engine (diesel engine) using light oil as fuel. The internal combustion engine 1 may alternatively be a spark ignition internal combustion engine using gasoline or the like as fuel, as long as it is operable using an air-fuel mixture having a lean air-fuel ratio that is higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.

The internal combustion engine 1 includes a fuel injection valve 3 that is configured to inject the fuel into a cylinder 2. In the case of the internal combustion engine 1 provided as the spark ignition internal combustion engine, the fuel injection valve 3 may be configured to inject the fuel into an air intake port.

The internal combustion engine 1 is connected with an air intake pipe 4. An air flow meter 40 is placed in the middle of the air intake pipe 4 to output an electric signal reflecting the amount (mass) of the intake air (the air) flowing in the air intake pipe 4. An air intake throttle valve 41 is placed downstream of the air flow meter 40 in the air intake pipe 4 to change the passage cross-sectional area of the air intake pipe 4 and thereby regulate the amount of the air taken into the internal combustion engine 1.

The internal combustion engine 1 is connected with an exhaust pipe 5. A catalyst casing SO is placed in the middle of the exhaust pipe 5. The catalyst casing 50 includes a cylindrical casing filled with an NSR catalyst.

The NSR catalyst chemically absorbs or physically adsorbs NO_(X) included in the exhaust gas when the exhaust gas has a lean air-fuel ratio higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, while releasing NO_(X) to accelerate reaction of the released NO_(X) with a reducing component (for example, a hydrocarbon MO or carbon monoxide (CO)) when the exhaust gas has a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, The catalyst casing 50 corresponds to one aspect of the “exhaust gas purification device” of the disclosure. An air-fuel ratio sensor 52 is mounted to the exhaust pipe 5 at a position upstream of the catalyst casing 50 to output an electric signal related to the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing in the exhaust pipe 5.

A filter casing 51 is placed, downstream of the catalyst casing 50 in the exhaust pipe 5. The filter casing 51 has a particulate filter placed inside of a cylindrical casing. The particulate filter is a wall-flow filter made of a porous base material and serves to trap PM included in the exhaust gas. An exhaust temperature sensor 53 and a PM sensor 54 are placed downstream of the filter casing 51 in the exhaust pipe 5 to output an electric signal related to the temperature of the exhaust gas flowing in the exhaust pipe 5 and output an electric signal related to the PM concentration of the exhaust gas flowing in the exhaust pipe 5, respectively.

The following describes the configuration of the PM sensor 54 with reference to FIG. 2. FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating the configuration of the PM sensor 54. The PM sensor 54 shown in FIG. 2 is an electrode-based PM sensor. Although the PM sensor 54 shown in FIG. 2 includes a pair of electrodes, the PM sensor may include multiple pairs of electrodes. The PM sensor 54 has a sensor element 543 including a pair of electrodes 541 and 542 that are placed away from each other on a surface of a plate-like insulator 540, an ammeter 544 that is configured to measure the electric current flowing between the electrodes 541 and 542, an electric heater 545 that is placed on a rear face of the sensor element 543, and a cover 546 that is configured to cover the sensor element 543. The cover 546 has a plurality of through holes 547 formed therein.

In the state that the PM sensor 54 having the above configuration is mounted to the exhaust pipe 5, part of the exhaust gas flowing in the exhaust pipe 5 passes through the through holes 547 to flow in the cover 546. When the exhaust gas flows in the cover 546, PM included in the exhaust gas adheres between the electrodes 541 and 542 (i.e., on the insulator 540). PM has electrical conductivity, so that deposition of a predetermined amount of PM between the electrodes 541 and 542 establishes electrical continuity between the electrodes 541 and 542. Applying a predetermined voltage from a power source to the electrodes 541 and 542 causes the electric current to flow between the electrodes 541 and 542 when the electrodes 541 and 542 are electrically when electrical continuity is established between the electrodes 541 and 549.

After the amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 reaches the predetermined amount, the resistance value between the electrodes 541 and 542 decreases with a further increase in amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542. Accordingly the value of current flowing between the electrodes 541 and 542 increases with an increase in amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542. The amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 is thus detectable by measuring the value of current flowing between the electrodes 541 and 542 with the ammeter 544.

When the amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 is less than the predetermined amount, the electrodes 541 and 542 have no electrical continuity, so that the output of the PM sensor 54 is zero. When the amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 reaches or exceeds the predetermined amount, the electrodes 541 and 542 have electrical continuity so that the output of the PM sensor 54 becomes higher than zero. After the electrical continuity is established between the electrodes 541 and 542, the output of the PM sensor 54 increases with a further increase in amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542. In the description below, the predetermined amount is referred to as “effective deposition amount”.

There is a limited space between the electrodes 541 and 542 to allow for deposition of PM. When the amount of PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 (hereinafter referred to as “deposition amount of PM”) reaches a predetermined upper limit amount (upper limit deposition amount), the electric current is supplied to the heater 545 to increase the temperature of the sensor element 543 to a temperature that allows for oxidation of PM and oxidize and remove the PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 (sensor recovery process).

Referring back to FIG. 1, the internal combustion engine 1 is provided with an ECU (electronic control unit) 6 as the controller of the disclosure. The ECU 6 may be programmed to perform disclosed functions The ECU 6 is provided as an electronic control unit including a CPU, a ROM, a RAM and a backup RAM. The ECU 6 is electrically connected with various sensors including an accelerator position sensor 7 and a crank position sensor 8, in addition to the air flow meter 40, the air-fuel ratio sensor 52, the exhaust temperature sensor 53 and the PM sensor 54 described above. The accelerator position sensor 7 is provided as a sensor that outputs an electric signal related to the operation amount (accelerator position) of an accelerator pedal (not shown). The crank position sensor 8 is provided as a sensor that outputs an electric signal related to the rotational position of an output shaft (crankshaft) of the internal combustion engine 1.

The ECU 6 is also electrically connected with various devices such as the fuel injection valve 3 and the intake air throttle valve 41 described above. The ECU 6 controls the above various devices, based on output signals from the above various sensors. For example, under a condition that the internal combustion engine 1 is operated with combustion of the air-fuel mixture having a lean air-fuel ratio (lean combustion operation), when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst reaches or exceeds a predefined upper limit storage amount, the ECU 6 controls the fuel injection valve 3 to change the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture subjected to combustion in the cylinder 2 from the lean air-fuel ratio to a rich air-fuel ratio (in-cylinder rich control), so as to reduce and convert NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst (rich spike process). The ECU 6 performing the in-cylinder rich control when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst becomes equal to or higher than the upper storage amount implements the “supplier” of the disclosure. The ECU 6 performs a failure diagnosis process of the particulate filter which is characteristic of disclosed embodiments, in addition to known processes such as the rich spike process described above. The following describes a procedure of the failure diagnosis process of the particulate filter.

The ECU 6 performs the sensor recovery process to remove the PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54, before performing failure diagnosis of the particulate filter. More specifically, the ECU 6 causes electric current to be supplied from the power source to the heater 545 of the PM sensor 54. Supplying electric current to the heater 545 causes the heater 545 to generate heat and thereby heat the sensor element 543. The ECU 6 controls the value of driving current of the heater 545 to adjust the temperature of the sensor element 543 to a temperature that allows for oxidation of PM. The temperature of the sensor element 543 may be regarded as being approximately equal to the temperature of the heater 545. The ECU 6 accordingly controls the current value to adjust the temperature of the heater 545 to the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM. The temperature of the heater 545 may be calculated from the resistance value of the heater 545.

When the state that the temperature of the sensor element 543 is adjusted to the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM continues for a specified recovery time, the ECU 6 stops the supply of electric current to the heater 545 and terminates the sensor recovery process. The specified recovery time denotes a time duration required for oxidation and removal of the PM depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54. For example, the specified recovery time may he fixed to a time duration required for oxidation and removal of the predetermined upper limit deposition amount of PM or may be changed according to the actual deposition amount of PM.

After termination of the sensor recovery process, the ECU 6 starts application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54. The ECU 6 then reads an output value of the PM sensor 54 at a time when a predetermined time period has elapsed since the start of application of the predetermined voltage (reading timing) and compares the output value with a predefined reference value in order to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter. The process of starting application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 after termination of the sensor recovery process and subsequently reading the output value of the PM sensor 54 after elapse of the predetermined time period corresponds to the “measurement process” of the disclosure.

When a failure such as breakage or erosion occurs in part of the particulate filter, the PM trapping efficiency of the particulate filter decreases. The amount of PM slipping through the particulate filter per unit time is larger in the case where the particulate filter has a failure than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure.

FIG. 3 is diagrams showing variations in deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 and in output value of the PM sensor 54 after termination of the sensor recovery process. FIG. 3(a) shows the elapsed time since the start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 as abscissa and the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 as ordinate. FIG. 3(b) shows the elapsed time since the, start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 as abscissa and the output value of the PM sensor 54 as ordinate. Solid-line graphs in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) show the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 and the output value of the PM sensor 54 in the case where the particulate filter has no failure. Dot-and-dash-line graphs in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) show the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 and the output value of the PM sensor 54 in the case where part of the particulate filter has a failure. The solid-line graphs and the dot-and-dash-line graphs show the results measured under identical conditions other than the presence or the absence of a failure in the particulate filter.

As shown in FIG. 3, immediately after a start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542, in both the case where the particulate filter has a failure and the case where the particulate filter has no failure, the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 is less than the effective deposition amount, so that the output value of the PM sensor 54 is zero. The amount of PM slipping through the particulate filter per unit time is, however, larger in the case where the particulate filter has a failure than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure. Accordingly, the timing when the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 reaches the effective deposition amount is earlier in the case where the particulate filter has a failure than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure. As a result, the timing when the output value of the PM sensor 54 starts increasing from zero (hereinafter referred to as “output start, timing”) is earlier in the case where the particulate filter has a failure (t1 in FIG. 3) than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure (t2 in FIG. 3). Additionally, the increase rate (increase amount per unit time) of the output value after the output start timing is higher in the case where the particulate filter has a failure than in the case where the particulate filter has no failure.

Here attention is focused on a predetermined timing (ts in FIG. 3) that is later than the output start timing t1 in the case where the particulate filter has a failure but is earlier than the output start timing t2 in the case where the particulate filter has no failure. At this predetermined timing ts, the output value of the PM sensor is zero in the case where the particulate filter has no failure, while being equal to or higher than a predefined reference value (Tr in FIG. 3) that is larger than zero in the case where the particulate filter has a failure.

By taking into account the above characteristic, the predetermined time period may be set to make the reading timing equal to the predetermined timing ts. This allows for diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter by comparing the output value of the PM sensor 54 at the time when the predetermined time period has elapsed since termination of the sensor recovery process with the predefined reference value Tr.

The predetermined time period denotes a required time duration between the time when application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 is started and the time when the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 becomes equal to or higher than the predefined reference value Pr on the assumption that the particulate filter has a failure. The ECU 6 accordingly assumes that the particulate filter has a failure at the time when application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 is started, and starts estimation (computation) of the amount of PM adhering to or depositing in the PM sensor 54. The ECU 6 determines that the predetermined time period has elapsed when the estimated deposition amount of PM reaches a predetermined deposition amount (for example, a deposition amount of PM that makes the output value of the PM sensor 54 equal to or higher than the predefined reference value Tr when part of the particulate filter has a failure). In the case where the output value of the PM sensor 54 is lower than the predefined reference value Tr at the time when the predetermined time period has elapsed (reading timing ts), the ECU 6 diagnoses that the particulate filter has no failure, in the case where the output value of the PM sensor 54 is equal to or higher than the predefined reference value Tr at the reading timing ts, on the other hand, the CPU 6 diagnoses that the particulate filter has a failure.

The output value of the PM sensor 54 is likely to include a measurement error, due to an initial tolerance of the PM sensor 54 or the like. The estimated deposition amount of PM is likely to include an estimation error, it is accordingly desirable to set the reading timing (predetermined timing) ts and the predefined reference value Tr respectively to a timing and a value that ensure diagnosis of a failure with high accuracy even when the measurement value of the PM sensor 54 includes a measurement error and the estimated deposition amount of PM includes an estimation error. For example, it is desirable to set the predefined reference value Tr to a sufficiently large value relative to the measurement error of the PM sensor 54 and the estimation error of the estimated deposition amount of PM and to set the reading timing is according to the setting of the predefined reference value Tr.

The estimated deposition amount of PM is estimated by integrating the amount of PM depositing in the PM sensor 54 per unit time on the assumption that the particulate filter has a failure. The amount of PM depositing in the PM sensor 54 per unit time is related to the flow rate of the exhaust gas (flow velocity of the exhaust gas)) flowing out of the particulate filter per unit time, the PM concentration of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter having a failure, and the difference between the temperature of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter and the temperature of the sensor element 543. For example, the amount of PM depositing in the PM sensor 54 per unit time increases with a decrease in flow rate of the exhaust gas. The amount of PM depositing in the PM sensor 54 per unit time also increases with an increase in PM concentration of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter having a failure. Additionally, the amount of PM depositing in the PM sensor 54 per unit time increases with an increase in difference between the temperature of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter and the temperature of the sensor element 543 (i.e., with an increase in temperature of the exhaust gas relative to the temperature of the sensor element 543). The amount of PM depositing in the PM sensor 54 per unit time may thus be estimated by using, as parameter, the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter per unit time, the PM concentration of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter on the assumption that the particulate filter has a failure, and the difference between the temperature of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter (i.e., output value of the exhaust temperature sensor 53) and the temperature of the sensor element 543 (i.e., temperature calculated from the resistance value of the heater 545).

The flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter per unit time may be regarded as being equal to the amount of intake air per unit time and may this be determined by using the output value of the air flow meter 40 as a parameter. The PM concentration of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter having a failure may be calculated by using, as parameters, the amount of PM discharged from the internal combustion engine 1 per unit time, the ratio of the amount of PM flowing out of the particulate filter having a failure to the amount of PM flowing into the particulate filter having the failure, and the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter per unit time. The PM adhering or depositing between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54 is mostly soot. It is accordingly preferable to determine the PM concentration of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter having a failure by using, as parameters, the amount of soot discharged from the internal combustion engine 1 per unit time, the ratio of the amount of soot flowing out of the particulate filter having a failure to the amount of soot flowing into the particulate filter having the failure (hereinafter referred to as “soot slip rate”) and the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing out of the particulate filter per unit time.

The amount of soot discharged from the internal combustion engine 1 per unit time is related to, for example, the amount of intake air, the amount of fuel injection, the temperature and the humidity and may thus be determined by referring to a predetermined map or computation model that uses these relating factors as parameters. The soot slip rate of the particulate filter having a failure is related to the amount of PM trapped by the particulate filter (hereinafter referred to as “trapped amount of PM”) and the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing into the particulate filter per unit time. For example, the soot slip rate increases with an increase in trapped amount of PM by the particulate filter. The soot slip rate also increases with an increase in flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing into the particulate filter per unit time. Accordingly, the soot slip rate of the particulate filter having a failure may be determined by referring to a predetermined map or computation model that uses, as parameters, the trapped amount of PM by the particulate filter and the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing into the particulate filter per unit time. The trapped amount of PM by the particulate filter may be calculated by using the operation history of the internal combustion engine 1 (for example, the integrated values of the amount of fuel injection and the amount of intake air) as parameters or may be calculated from the output value of a differential pressure sensor (not shown) that is configured to detect a pressure difference before and after the particulate filter.

Intensive experiments and examinations have resulted in obtaining the finding that the output value of the PM sensor 54 at the reading timing ts is lower in the case where the in-cylinder rich control described above is performed in a time period between the start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 and the reading timing ts (i.e., in the predetermined time period) than in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed.

FIG. 4 is diagrams showing variations in deposition amount of PM and in output value of the PM sensor 54 after termination of the sensor recovery process in the case where the particulate filter has a failure. FIG. 4(a) shows the elapsed time since the start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 as abscissa and the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 as ordinate. FIG. 4(b) shows the elapsed time since the start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 as abscissa and the output value of the PM sensor 54 when the particulate filter has a failure as ordinate. A solid-line graph in FIG. 4(b) shows the output value of the PM sensor 54 when the in-cylinder rich control is performed in at least part of the predetermined time period. A dot-and-dash-line graph in FIG. 4(b) shows the output value of the PM sensor 54 when the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period. The solid-line graph and the dot-and-dash-line graph in FIG. 4(b) show the results measured under identical conditions other than execution or non-execution of the in-cylinder rich control.

As shown in FIG. 4, the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period and the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period have substantially similar output start timing of the PM sensor 54 (t3 in FIG. 4) but have different output values of the PM sensor 54 after the output start timing. More specifically, the output value of the PM sensor 54 is lower in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period than in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period. Accordingly, the output value of the PM sensor 54 at the reading timing ts is lower in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed (Cpm2 in FIG. 4(b)) than in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed (Cmp1 in FIG. 4(b)).

The mechanism of the phenomenon shown in FIG. 4 is not clearly elucidated but is estimated as follows. The stronger linkage of SOF (soluble organic fraction) with soot included in the exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine 1 is expected in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is performed than in the case where the in-cylinder rich control is not performed. Accordingly, when the in-cylinder rich control is not performed, SOF is expected to hardly adhere and deposit between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54, while only soot is expected to adhere and deposit between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54. When the in-cylinder rich control is performed, on the other hand, SOF as well as soot is expected to adhere and deposit between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54. The electrical conductivity of SOF is lower than the electrical conductivity of soot. It is accordingly expected to increase the electric resistance between the electrodes 541 and 542 and thereby decrease the output value of the PM sensor 54 in the case where SOF deposits between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54, compared with the case where SOF hardly deposits. In other words, in the case where PM including SOF deposits between the electrodes 541 and 542, the value of current flowing between the electrodes 541 and 542 is expected to he lower than the current value corresponding to the actual deposition amount of PM.

When the in-cylinder rich control is performed in at least part of the predetermined time period, SOF deposits between the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54. As shown by the solid-line graph in FIG. 4(b), the output value Cpm2 of the PM sensor 54 at the reading timing ts is likely to he lower than the predefined reference value Tr. This may lead to incorrect diagnosis that the particulate filter that actually has a failure is diagnosed to have no failure.

In order to avoid such incorrect diagnosis due to the deposition of SOF described above, the procedure of this embodiment performs the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 5, at the time when in-cylinder rich control is activated (when an “in-cylinder rich control flag” is set ON in FIG. 5) by the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst reaching or exceeding the upper limit storage amount described. above, the ECU 6 activates the sensor recovery process (sets a “sensor recovery process flag” ON in FIG. 5). The ECU 6 then performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process. The configuration of performing the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control enables the measurement process to be started at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. In other words, this enables the measurement process to be started when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is sufficiently smaller than the upper limit storage amount. As a result, this enables the measurement process to he completed prior to subsequent execution of the in-cylinder rich control and thereby prevents the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period. This reduces the incorrect diagnosis that the particulate filter that actually has a failure is diagnosed to have no failure.

The following describes a procedure of failure diagnosis process according to this embodiment with reference to FIG. 6. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU 6 to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter. This processing routine is stored in advance in the ROM of the ECU 6 and is repeatedly performed at predetermined time intervals during operation of the internal combustion engine 1. This processing routine is performed on the premise that the internal combustion engine 1 and the PM sensor 54 are operated normally.

In the processing routine of FIG. 6, the ECU 6 first determines whether a failure detection flag is equal to value “0” at S101. The failure detection flag denotes a storage area provided in advance in, for example, the backup RAM of the ECU 6 and is set to “0” upon determination that the particulate filter is normal in this processing routine, while being set to “1” upon determination that the particulate filter has a failure in this processing routine. In the case of a negative answer at S101, the ECU 6 terminates this processing routine. In the case of an affirmative answer at S101, on the other hand, the ECU 6 proceeds to S102.

At S102, the ECU 6 determines whether conditions of the measurement process (measurement conditions) are satisfied. More specifically, the ECU 6 determines that the measurement conditions are satisfied upon satisfaction of specified conditions, for example, that the measurement process is not performed at the current moment and that electric power required for the sensor recovery process is obtainable (i.e., the state of charge of a battery or the amount of power generation by a generator exceeds the amount of electric power required for the sensor recovery process). In the case of a negative answer at S102, the ECU 6 terminates this processing routine, In the case of an affirmative answer at S102, on the other hand, the ECU 6 proceeds to S103.

At step S103, the ECU 6 determines whether the in-cylinder rich control flag is ON, i.e., whether the in-cylinder rich control is being performed. In the case of a negative answer at S103, the ECU 6 terminates this processing routine. In the case of an affirmative answer at S103, on the other hand, the ECU 6 proceeds to S104.

At S104, the ECU 6 sets the sensor recovery process flag ON and supplies the electric current to the heater 545 of the PM sensor 54, so as to start the sensor recovery process. At S105, the ECU 6 subsequently determines whether the execution time of the sensor recovery process is equal to or longer than the specified recovery time. In the case of a negative answer at S105, the ECU 6 returns to S104 to continue the sensor recovery process. In the case of an affirmative answer at S105, on the other hand, the ECU 6 proceeds to S106 to stop the supply of electric current to the heater 545 and sets the sensor recovery process flag OFF, so as to terminate the sensor recovery process. After terminating the sensor recovery process at S106, the ECU 6 proceeds to S107.

At step S107, the ECU 6 determines whether the in-cylinder rich control flag is OFF, i.e., whether the in-cylinder rich control has been terminated. In the case of a negative answer at S107, this means that the in-cylinder rich control has not yet been terminated at the time when the sensor recovery process is terminated. The ECU 6 accordingly repeats the processing of S107. In the case of an affirmative answer at S107, on the other hand, this means that the in-cylinder rich control has already been terminated at the time when the sensor recovery process is terminated. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S108.

At S108, the ECU 6 applies the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 of the PM sensor 54 to start the measurement process. Immediately after termination of the sensor recovery process, the sensor element 543 is in a high temperature atmosphere, so that there is a possibility that PM flowing in between the electrodes 541 and 542 does not deposit but is oxidized. Accordingly, it is desirable that, the ECU 6 starts application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 when the temperature of the sensor element 543 decreases to a temperature range where PM is not oxidized. When application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 is started immediately after termination of the sensor recovery process, the predetermined time period described later may be set to include a time duration required for decreasing the temperature of the sensor element 543 to the temperature range where PM is not oxidized.

At S109, the ECU 6 computes an elapsed time from the start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 to the current moment and determines whether the elapsed time is equal to or longer than the predetermined time period. As described above, the predetermined time period denotes a required time duration between the time when application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 is started and the time when the deposition amount of PM in the PM sensor 54 becomes equal to or higher than the predefined reference value Tr on the assumption that the particulate filter has a failure. In the case of a negative answer at S109, the ECU 6 returns to S108. In the case of an affirmative answer at S109, on the other hand, the ECU 6 proceeds to S110.

At S110, the ECU 6 reads the output value of the PM sensor 54 (Cpm in FIG. 6). The output value Cpm read at S110 is the output value of the PM sensor 54 when the predetermined time period has elapsed since the start of application of the predetermined voltage to the electrodes 541 and 542 and corresponds to the output value of the PM sensor 54 at the predetermined timing (reading timing) is described above with reference to FIG. 3.

On completion of the processing at S110, the ECU 6 diagnoses a failure of the particulate filter by the processing of S111 to S113. At S111, the ECU 6 determines whether the output value Cpm read at S110 is lower than the predefined reference value Tr, In the case of an affirmative answer at S111 (Cpm<Tr), the ECU 6 proceeds to S112 to determine that the particulate filter is normal (has no failure) and stores “0” in the failure detection flag. in the case of a negative answer at S111 (Cpm≧Tr), on the other hand, the ECU 6 proceeds to S113 to determine that the particulate filter has a failure and stores “1” in the failure detection flag. Upon determination that the particulate filter has a failure at S113, the ECU 6 may store failure information of the particulate filter in the backup RAM or the like and may turn on a malfunction indication lamp (MIL) provided in the vehicle interior.

Performing the diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter according to the processing routine of FIG. 6 as described above enables the measurement process to he performed at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and thereby prevents next in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period. This reduces the incorrect diagnosis that the particulate filter that actually has a failure is diagnosed to have no failure.

The processing routine of FIG. 6 describes the configuration that the sensor recovery process is started at a certain timing during execution of the in-cylinder rich control. The sensor recovery process may, however, be started simultaneously with start of the in-cylinder rich control or may be started immediately before start of the in-cylinder rich control (for example, when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst reaches a specified amount that is slightly smaller than the upper limit storage amount). Starting the sensor recovery process at any of such timings enables the sensor recovery process to be terminated during execution of the in-cylinder rich control or at an earlier time after termination of the in rich control. This advances the execution timing of the measurement process and thereby more effectively prevents next in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period.

This embodiment describes the configuration that the sensor recovery process is performed during execution of the in-cylinder rich control. According to a modification, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process may he triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and sequentially performed. This modified configuration also enables the measurement process to be completed at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. In the configuration that the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and are sequentially performed, preheat treatment may be performed with the heater 545 during execution of the in-cylinder rich control to heat the sensor element 543 to a specified temperature that is lower than the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM and higher than the minimum temperature to activate the sensor element 543. In this modified configuration, the sensor element 543 is preheated at the time when the in-cylinder rich control is terminated. This shortens a required time duration for heating the sensor element 543 to the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM in the sensor recovery process. This results in terminating the sensor recovery process at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and starting the measurement process.

Modification 1 of Embodiment 1

In Embodiment 1 described above, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst. According to a modification, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process may be performed according to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst.

The NSR catalyst placed in the catalyst casing 50 stores sulfur compounds (SO_(X)) included in the exhaust gas, in addition to NO included in the exhaust gas. The NO_(X) storage capacity of the NSR catalyst decreases with an increase in amount of SO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst. There is accordingly a need to perform a process of removing SO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst when the amount of SO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst (sulfur poisoning amount) reaches or exceeds a predetermined upper limit poisoning amount. For removal of SO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst, the NSR catalyst should be at high-temperature and in a rich atmosphere. The ECU 6 accordingly performs in-cylinder rich control when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst reaches or exceeds the upper limit poisoning amount. This increases the temperature of the NSR catalyst with the heat of oxidation reaction of the fuel included in the exhaust gas and controls the atmosphere of the NSR catalyst to the rich atmosphere. As in the case where the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period, performing such in-cylinder rich control in the predetermined time period may lead to inaccurate diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter.

As shown in FIG. 7, at the time when in-cylinder rich control is activated (when an “in-cylinder rich control flag” is set ON in FIG. 7) by the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst reaching or exceeding the upper limit poisoning amount described above, the ECU 6 activates the sensor recovery process (sets a “sensor recovery process flag” ON in FIG. 7). The ECU 6 then performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process. The configuration of performing the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control enables the measurement process to he started at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. In other words, this enables the measurement process to be started when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is sufficiently smaller than the upper limit poisoning amount. As a result, this prevents the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period and thus ensures accurate diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter.

The ECU 6 may perform the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst, addition to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst. This increases the opportunity of performing diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter and thereby allows for earlier detection of a failure of the particulate filter.

Modification 2 of Embodiment 1

In Embodiment 1 described above, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst. According to a modification, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process may be performed according to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to an SCR catalyst placed downstream of the NSR catalyst.

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of an internal combustion engine and its air intake and exhaust system with which disclosed embodiments may be applied. The like components to those of FIG. 1 described above are expressed by the like numerical symbols in FIG. 8. As shown in FIG. 8, a catalyst casing 55 is placed between the catalyst casing 50 and the filter casing 51 in the exhaust pipe 5. This catalyst casing 55 includes a cylindrical casing filled with the SCR catalyst. The SCR catalyst serves to adsorb NH₃ included in the exhaust gas and reduce NO_(X) in the exhaust gas using the adsorbed NH₃ as a reducing agent. In the emission control system having this configuration, when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst decreases to or below a predetermined lower limit adsorption amount, the ECU 6 starts in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying HN₃ to the SCR catalyst. When the in-cylinder rich control is performed, NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst of the catalyst casing 50 is reduced to produce NH₃. The NSR catalyst of the catalyst casing 50 accordingly works as the NH₃ producing catalyst. NH₃ produced by the NSR catalyst flows, along with the exhaust gas, into the catalyst casing 55 and is adsorbed to the SCR catalyst. As in the case where the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst is performed, performing the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst in the predetermined time period may lead to inaccurate diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter.

As shown in FIG. 9, at the time when in-cylinder rich control is activated (when an “in-cylinder rich control flag” is set ON in FIG. 9) by the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst decreasing to or below the lower limit adsorption amount described above, the ECU 6 activates the sensor recovery process (sets a “sensor recovery process flag” ON in FIG. 9). The ECU 6 then performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process. The configuration of performing the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control enables the measurement process to be started at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control. In other words, this enables the measurement process to be started when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is sufficiently larger than the lower limit adsorption amount. As a result, this prevents the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period and thus ensures accurate diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter.

The failure diagnosis process described in this modification is also applicable to the case where a three-way catalyst, instead of the NSR catalyst, is placed in the catalyst casing 50. In this modified configuration, when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR, catalyst decreases to or below the lower limit adsorption amount described above, in-cylinder rich control is performed for the purpose of producing NH₃ by the three-way catalyst.

The ECU 6 may perform the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst and/or according to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst, in addition to the execution timing of in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst. This increases the opportunity of performing diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter and thereby allows for earlier detection of a failure of the particulate filter.

Embodiment 2

The following describes Embodiment 2 of the disclosure with reference to FIG. 10. The following describes only a configuration different from Embodiment 1 described above and does not specifically describe the similar configuration. The procedure of Embodiment 1 performs the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control as described above. The procedure of Embodiment 2, on the other hand, predicts whether in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period before the sensor recovery process is actually started. On prediction that in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, like the procedure of Embodiment 1, the procedure of Embodiment 2 performs the sensor recovery process and the measurement process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control. On prediction that in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period, on the other hand, the procedure of Embodiment 2 performs the sensor recovery process and the measurement process immediately.

More specifically when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is less than a predetermined NO_(X) storage amount (allowable storage amount) that is smaller than the upper limit storage amount described above, the ECU 6 predicts that in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period. When the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable storage amount, on the other hand, the ECU 6 predicts that in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period. The “allowable storage amount” is provided as a NO_(X) storage amount that causes in-cylinder rich control for the purpose f reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst to he performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed in the state that the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable storage amount, and may be determined in advance by a fitting operation based on an experiment or the like.

The following describes a procedure of failure diagnosis process according to this embodiment with reference to FIG. 10. FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU 6 to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter. The like steps to those of the processing routine of FIG. 6 are expressed by the like step numbers in. FIG. 10.

In the processing routine of FIG. 10, in the case of an affirmative answer at S102, the ECU 6 determines that there is a request for performing the measurement process and proceeds to S201. At S201, the ECU 6 predicts whether performing the sensor recovery process and the measurement process at the current moment leads to the possibility that in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period. More specifically, the ECU 6 determines whether the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst (Anox in FIG. 10) is less than the allowable storage amount (Anoxt in FIG. 10). The NO_(X) storage amount Anox of the NSR catalyst is determined by a separate processing routine and is stored in a specified storage area of the backup RAM. The NO_(X) storage amount Anox may be estimated and computed based on the operation history of the internal combustion engine 1 (for example, the amount of intake air and the amount of fuel injection) or may be calculated from the measurement values of NO_(X) sensors provided before and after the catalyst casing 50.

In the case of an affirmative answer at S201, it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S202 to start the sensor recovery process. When the execution time of the sensor recovery process becomes equal to or longer than the specified recovery time, the ECU 6 has an affirmative answer at S203 and proceeds to S204. At S204, the ECU 6 stops the supply of electric current to the heater 545 to terminate the sensor recovery process. After the processing of S204, the ECU 6 performs the processing of and after S108.

In the case of a negative answer at S201, on the other hand, it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S205 without starting the sensor recovery process. At S205, the ECU 6 performs the sensor recovery process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control, like the procedure of Embodiment 1 described above. More specifically, at S205, the ECU 6 performs the sensor recovery process according to the same procedure as that of S103 to S107 in the processing routine of FIG. 6. After terminating the sensor recovery process, the ECU 6 performs the processing of and after S108.

As described above, in the diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter by the processing routine of FIG. 10, on prediction that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, the sensor recovery process is performed according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control. This enables the measurement process to be performed at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and thereby prevents the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period. On prediction that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period, on the other hand, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed immediately. This ensures quick detection of a failure of the particulate filter.

Modification 1 of Embodiment 2

The procedure of Embodiment 2 described above predicts whether the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period and controls the execution timings of the sensor recovery process and the measurement process based on the prediction. A modification may predict whether in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period and control the execution timings of the sensor recording process and the measurement process based on the prediction. More specifically, when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is less than a predetermined sulfur poisoning amount (allowable poisoning amount) that is smaller than the upper limit poisoning amount described above, the ECU 6 predicts that in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst is not performed in the predetermined time period. When the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable poisoning amount, on the other hand, the ECU 6 predicts that in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period. The “allowable poisoning amount” is provided as a sulfur poisoning amount that causes in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst to he performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed in the state that the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable poisoning amount, and may he determined in advance by a fitting operation based on an experiment or the like.

The following describes a procedure of failure diagnosis process according to this modification with reference to FIG. 11. FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU 6 to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter. The like steps to those of the processing routine of FIG. 10 are expressed by the like step numbers in FIG. 11.

In the processing routine of FIG. 11, in the case of an affirmative answer at S102, the ECU 6 proceeds to S301, instead of S201. At S301, the ECU 6 determines whether the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst (Asox in FIG. 11) is less than the allowable poisoning amount (Asoxt in FIG. 11). The sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst may he estimated based on the operation history of the internal combustion engine 1 (for example, the integrated values of the amount of fuel injection and the amount of intake air) or may be calculated from the measurement value of a SO_(X) sensor provided upstream of the catalyst casing 50.

In the case of an affirmative answer at S301 it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR, catalyst is not performed in the predetermined time period. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S202 to start the sensor recovery process. In the case of a negative answer at S301, on the other hand, it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S205 to perform the sensor recovery process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control.

As described above, in the diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter by the processing routine of FIG. 11, on prediction that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period, the sensor recovery process is performed according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control. This enables the measurement process to be performed at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and thereby prevents the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period. On prediction that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of eliminating sulfur poisoning of the NSR catalyst is not performed in the predetermined time period, on the other hand, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed immediately. This ensures quick detection of a failure of the particulate filter.

Upon satisfaction of at least one of the conditions that the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable poisoning amount and that the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable storage amount, the ECU 6 may predict that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period.

Modification 2 of Embodiment 2

The procedure of Embodiment 2 described above predicts whether the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of reducing NO_(X) stored in the NSR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period and controls the execution timings of the sensor recovery process and the measurement process based on the prediction. In the configuration that the SCR catalyst is placed downstream of the NSR catalyst as described above with reference to FIG. 8, a modification may predict whether in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period and control the execution timings of the sensor recording process and the measurement process based on the prediction. More specifically, when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is greater than a predetermined NH₃ adsorption amount (allowable adsorption amount) that is larger than the lower limit adsorption amount described above, the ECU 6 predicts that in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is not performed in the predetermined time period. When the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is equal to or less than the allowable adsorption amount, on the other hand, the ECU 6 predicts that in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period. The “allowable adsorption amount” is provided as an NH₃ adsorption amount that causes in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst to be performed in the predetermined time period in the case where the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed in the state that the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is equal to or less than the allowable adsorption amount, and may be determined in advance by a fitting operation based on an experiment or the like.

The following describes a procedure of failure diagnosis process according to this modification with reference to FIG. 12. FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing routine performed by the ECU 6 to diagnose a failure of the particulate filter. The like steps to those of the processing routine of FIG. 10 are expressed by the like step numbers in FIG. 12.

In the processing routine of FIG. 12, in the case of an affirmative answer at S102, the ECU 6 proceeds to S401, instead of S201. At S401, the ECU 6 determines whether the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst (Anh3 in FIG. 12) is greater than the allowable adsorption amount (Anh3t in FIG. 12). The NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst may he determined by computing a balance between the amount of NH₃ consumed by, for example, reduction of NO_(X) by the SCR catalyst and the amount of NH₃ produced by the NSR catalyst.

In the case of an affirmative answer at S401, it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is not performed in the predetermined time period. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S202 to start the sensor recovery process. In the case of a negative answer at S401, on the other hand, it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period. The ECU 6 accordingly proceeds to S205 to perform the sensor recovery process according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control.

As described above, in the diagnosis of a failure of the particulate filter by the processing routine of FIG. 12, on prediction that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is performed in the predetermined time period, the sensor recovery process is performed according to the execution timing of the in-cylinder rich control. This enables the measurement process to be performed at an earlier time after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and thereby prevents the in-cylinder rich control from being performed in the predetermined time period. On prediction that the in-cylinder rich control for the purpose of supplying NH₃ to the SCR catalyst is not performed in the predetermined time period, on the other hand, the sensor recovery process and the measurement process are performed immediately. This ensures quick detection of a failure of the particulate filter.

The failure diagnosis process described in this modification is also applicable to the case where a three-way catalyst, instead of the NSR catalyst, is placed in the catalyst casing 50. In this modified configuration, when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst decreases to or below the allowable adsorption amount described above, in-cylinder rich control is performed for the purpose of producing NH₃ by the three-way catalyst,

Upon satisfaction of at least one of the conditions that the NO_(X) storage amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable storage amount, that the sulfur poisoning amount of the NSR catalyst is equal to or greater than the allowable poisoning amount, and that the NH₃ adsorption amount of the SCR catalyst is equal to or less than the allowable adsorption amount, the ECU 6 may predict that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period.

While disclosed embodiments have been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the embodiments are not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.

This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-058558, filed on Mar. 20, 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

1 internal combustion engine

2 cylinder

3 fuel injection valve

4 air intake pipe

5 exhaust pipe

6 ECU

40 air flow meter

41 pair intake throttle valve

50 catalyst casing

51 filter casing

52 air-fuel ratio sensor

53 exhaust temperature sensor

54 PM sensor

55 catalyst casing

540 insulator

541 electrode

543 sensor element

544 ammeter

545 heater

546 cover

547 through holes 

What is claimed is:
 1. A failure diagnosis device for an emission control system, wherein the emission control system includes a particulate filter that is placed in an exhaust conduit of an internal combustion engine and that is configured to trap PM in exhaust gas; an exhaust gas purification device that is placed upstream of the particulate filter in the exhaust conduit and that is configured to purify the exhaust gas by utilizing a non-combusted fuel component included in the exhaust gas; and a supplier that is configured to perform in-cylinder rich control of changing an air-fuel ratio of an air-fuel mixture subjected to combustion in the internal combustion engine to a rich air-fuel ratio which is lower than a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, so as to supply the non-combusted fuel component to the exhaust gas purification device, the failure diagnosis device comprising: a PM sensor that is provided to detect an amount of PM flowing out of the particulate filter, the PM sensor having a sensor element that includes electrodes opposed to each other across an insulating layer and a heater that is configured to heat the sensor element, the PM sensor being configured to output an electric signal relating to an amount of PM depositing between the electrodes under application of a predetermined voltage to the sensor element; and a controller comprising at least one processor configured to perform a process of diagnosing a failure of the particulate filter, based on an output value of the PM sensor, wherein the controller is programmed to: perform a sensor recovery process that controls the heater to heat the sensor element to a temperature that allows for oxidation of PM and thereby oxidizes and removes the PM depositing between the electrodes, and a measurement process that starts application of the predetermined voltage to the sensor element after termination of the sensor recovery process and measures an output value of the PM sensor when a predetermined time period has elapsed since start of application of the predetermined voltage; and diagnose a failure of the particulate filter by comparing the obtained output value of the PM sensor with a predefined reference value, wherein the controller performs the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process.
 2. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 1, wherein when the sensor recovery process is triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control, the controller performs preheat treatment that controls the heater to heat the sensor element to a specified temperature lower than the temperature that allows for oxidation of PM during the in-cylinder rich control.
 3. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 1, wherein the controller is further programmed to: predict whether the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, before the sensor recovery process is actually performed, wherein when it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, the controller performs the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process, and when it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period, the controller performs the sensor recovery process and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the sensor recovery process.
 4. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 2, wherein the controller is further programmed to: predict whether the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, before the sensor recovery process is actually performed, wherein when it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period, the controller is programmed to perform the sensor recovery process during the in-cylinder rich control or triggered by termination of the in-cylinder rich control and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the in-cylinder rich control and the sensor recovery process, and when it is predicted that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period, the controller is programmed to perform the sensor recovery process and subsequently performs the measurement process after termination of the sensor recovery process.
 5. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 3, wherein the exhaust gas purification device includes an NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst that is configured to store NO_(X) in the exhaust gas when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a lean air-fuel ratio higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst, when a NO_(X) storage amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst becomes equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limit storage amount, and the controller is programmed to predict that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is equal to or greater than an allowable storage amount which is smaller than the upper limit storage amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed the predetermined time period when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is less than the allowable storage amount.
 6. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 4, wherein the exhaust gas purification device includes an NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst that is configured to store NO_(X) in the exhaust gas when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a lean air-fuel ratio higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst, when a NO_(X) storage amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst becomes equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limit storage amount, and the controller predicts that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is equal to or greater than an allowable storage amount which is smaller than the upper limit storage amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period when the NO_(X) storage amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is less than the allowable storage amount.
 7. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 3, wherein the exhaust gas purification device includes an NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst that is configured to store NO_(X) in the exhaust gas when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a lean air-fuel ratio higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control to remove a sulfur component from the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst when a sulfur poisoning amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst becomes equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limit poisoning amount, and the controller predicts that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is equal to or greater than an allowable poisoning amount which is smaller than the upper limit poisoning amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is less than the allowable poisoning amount.
 8. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 4, wherein the exhaust gas purification device includes an NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst that is configured to store NO_(X) in the exhaust gas when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a lean air-fuel ratio higher than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and to reduce NO_(X) stored in the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric ratio, the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control to remove a sulfur component from the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst when a sulfur poisoning amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst becomes equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limit poisoning amount, and the controller predicts that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is equal to or greater than an allowable poisoning amount which is smaller than the upper limit poisoning amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period when the sulfur poisoning amount of the NO_(X) storage reduction catalyst is less than the allowable poisoning amount.
 9. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 3, wherein the exhaust gas purification device includes a selective catalytic reduction catalyst that is configured to adsorb NH₃ included in the exhaust gas and reduce NO_(X) in the exhaust gas using the adsorbed NH₃ as a reducing agent, and an NH₃ producing catalyst that is placed upstream of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst and is configured to produce NH₃ when an air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control to produce NH₃ by the NH₃ producing catalyst when an NH₃ adsorption amount of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst becomes equal to or less than a predetermined lower limit adsorption amount, and the controller predicts that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst is equal to or less than an allowable adsorption amount which is larger than the lower limit adsorption amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst is greater than the allowable adsorption amount.
 10. The failure diagnosis device of the emission control system according to claim 4, wherein the exhaust gas purification device includes a selective catalytic reduction catalyst that is configured to adsorb NH₃ included in the exhaust gas and reduce NO_(X) in the exhaust gas using the adsorbed NH₃ as a reducing agent, and an NH₃ producing catalyst that is placed upstream of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst and is configured to produce NH₃ when tin air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is a rich air-fuel ratio lower than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the supplier performs the in-cylinder rich control to produce NH₃ by the NH₃ producing catalyst when an NH₃ adsorption amount of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst becomes equal to or less than a predetermined lower limit adsorption amount, and the controller predicts that the in-cylinder rich control is performed in the predetermined time period when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst is equal to or less than an allowable adsorption amount which is larger than the lower limit adsorption amount, while predicting that the in-cylinder rich control is not performed in the predetermined time period when the NH₃ adsorption amount of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst is greater than the allowable adsorption amount. 